Nadav Rindler
Writing 1
4/16/08
Researched Analysis Essay
Redefining Che Guevara: The Transformation of His Image and Message
The iconic and widely-recognizable image of Che Guevara dates back to a photograph taken by Alberto Korda on March 5, 1960. Virtually unknown until Che’s death in 1968, the picture was first published in 1967 in Italy. Designed by artist James Fitzpatrick into the famous screenprint, the image was rapidly disseminated in a wave of student protests in Europe in 1968. It has since “become associated with every site of struggle from Soweto to the Seattle protests against the World Trade Organisation” (Galloway). Che was at once either a martyr or a terrorist; his image stood as a symbol for protest and the struggle against imperialism, but also as pro-Communist and anti-American.
Now, forty years after Che’s death, his image has been utilized by social and political groups for a variety of (often contradictory) purposes. Radical leftist movements such as the Zapatistas and FARC continue to use it as an ideological pillar and as a figurehead of revolution, even as conservative elements such as the Church have also appropriated Che’s image for an entirely different purpose. The Zapatista Liberation Army has adopted Che’s ideals and answered his call to revolution. Their dynamic leader, Subcomandante Marcos, has modeled his own image and message in Che’s style, often drawing comparisons between himself and the revolutionary. Perhaps the most fascinating use of Che’s image has been by the Church, which stood directly in opposition of Che’s secular communist convictions.In a 1999 Easter campaign, the Anglican Church of England controversially placed Jesus’ face onto Che’s picture. In place of a beret, Jesus wears a crown of thorns, while the caption below reads “Meek. Mild. As If.” The Church, in an attempt to increase attendance among a younger crowd, revitalized Jesus’ image as a Che-like revolutionary.
Much academic discourse on Che’s image concerns the commercialization of his image and the deconstruction of his message by the American media. Rather than discuss instances where Che’s image is separated from its message, I will explore the role of Che’s image in the transformation of his message in specific contexts. As mentioned above, both Subcomandante Marcos and Jesus have been compared to Che. Within these two contexts, opposing social and political actors inherently alter Che’s message through the intentional manipulation of his image. This process of transforming Che’s message is undertaken by utilizing symbols within images that are shared between Che and Marcos, or between Che and Jesus. Ultimately, examining Che’s image depicts the larger role of images in creating, remembering, and altering heroes by society.
